Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
At a glance
- Public comments
- 6
- Last 30 days
- 0
Last discussed Feb 18, 2026.
Public comments (6)
Introduced the Stonewood Solar development team and outlined the expert presentations supporting the project.
Planning Board (Regular) - Feb 18, 2026 · 50:03 →Presented the 10-megawatt solar project details, emphasizing local grid connection with Greenville Utilities, temporary construction jobs, and increased tax revenue.
Planning Board (Regular) - Feb 18, 2026 · 51:31 →Summarized the civil engineering aspects, noting that the project exceeds county requirements with 100-foot setbacks and complete decommissioning plans.
Planning Board (Regular) - Feb 18, 2026 · 54:34 →Reviewed property value studies and appraisal data, concluding that solar projects with proper landscaping and setbacks have no negative impact on home values.
Planning Board (Regular) - Feb 18, 2026 · 55:58 →Strongly opposed the solar project as a fifth-generation farmer, emphasizing the permanent loss of high-yield agricultural land and the difficulty of restoring altered soil.
Planning Board (Regular) - Feb 18, 2026 · 59:19 →Expressed concerns about solar development lowering residential property values, disrupting rural lifestyles, impacting local drainage, and paying reduced tax rates compared to farmers.
Planning Board (Regular) - Feb 18, 2026 · 1:01:38 →